- Message Board
- Start New Topic
- Group Members
|
Is there any connection between science and philosophy?
Posted by Popi
|
Aug 25, 2006 1:44 PM |
|
philosophy without science is absurd and science without philosohy is lame
....that guy whose name i can't remember really , i don't really know enough about either to comment. But, Science seems to be more oreiented towards particular experiments and establishing particular facts. Philosophy works from particular instances to derive general truths. Posted by Trevor
|
Aug 25, 2006 2:27 PM |
|
certainly.
the ancient term for science was in fact "natural philosophy", the grandfather of what seems to be today's most accurate method of explaining science known as "Intelligent Design" (I.D. is a purely scientific philosophy, supported by all fields of reputable science and new earth-shaking discoveries, and uses the theory of an infinate scientific force, so infinate as to act outside the laws of science, and more powerful than gravity, heat, magnetism, or light, as being the cause of all matter, energy, and time which can be measured within the laws of science, as contrasted with the Creation Theory, which calls this force "God") Posted by Jeri
|
Aug 25, 2006 8:52 PM |
|
Ofcorse,
All scientist whom created main science theories and relations were philosophers, and they devide philosophy to parts, such as: Logic, social science, mathematics, physics and metaphysics. Ofcourse I can't mention them all, but i really respect almost of them, like Dikart, Aflatoon, Aristu, Al-Hassan Ebd Al-Haisam, Ebn-Roshd Al-Khwarezmy, Kont, ant etc... All of them operated thier minds for inventions and to reach the truth, and they gave us experiences and gained us by knowledge which is considered the main of our known sciences nowadys. Posted by Abd El Rahman Bissar
|
Aug 26, 2006 2:01 AM |
|
Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein etc. were Philosophers although we refer to them as scientists.
Philosopy made science. Richard Posted by Richard
|
Aug 26, 2006 4:35 AM |
|
NONO, that was not the ancient name for science, that was the name for physics, the principia of newton has this included, referring to physics.
Posted by Noel
|
Aug 26, 2006 4:10 PM |
|
hey dude ..you must be very ignorant ...newtow and einstein
werent philosophers but descartes was as well as kant ..who also made some science too Posted by louis the true dark night
|
Nov 11, 2007 2:07 PM |
|
Philosofy and science...We might think they're opposite poles, but it's not true. The mother of all sciences is really the philosofy. They were both created by man and they are part of our perception of reality. They are the answer of our questions about life.
Posted by Fernanda
|
Nov 11, 2007 2:27 PM |
|
Science is a collection of biased "facts" and "causes" created by selfish intelligent children trying to fathom the mind of God.
Anyone who glorifies science above the Creator and the Mystery of all of His Creations is merely an unrealistic fool. Philosophy is a collection of biased "theories" and "causes" created by selfish intelligent children trying to fathom the mind of God. Anyone who glorifies Philosophy above the Creator and the Mystery of all of His Creations is merely an unrealistic fool. God invented Science and Philosophy...Do any of these Scientists or Philosophers consult Him ? Who knows more about Creation, the Created or the Creator? The answer should be obvious. Posted by robertallen
|
May 16, 2008 11:06 AM |
|
Robertallen Mills
Obviously if anyone is more ignorant and biased on science and philosophy, then thats you. -- Anyone who glorifies science above the Creator and the Mystery of all of His Creations is merely an unrealistic fool. -- That just proved my point. If you can't reason then please don't bash Science or make any claims. Posted by Chiran
|
May 16, 2008 11:43 AM |
| Americas | Europe | Eastern Europe Asia Pacific |